2025
Global Power Transmission Report
Regional Market Overviews
United States
GDP (Current Prices) USD (2023) | 27,721 Bn |
Projected Average GDP Growth (2024-2028) | 2.2% |
10-year Govt Bond Yield (12-month rolling average) | 4.2% |
Country Credit Rating | AA+ |
Renewable Energy Share | 16% |
Total Transmission Line Length (Km) | 551,4000 |
Transmission Network
The US power transmission system consists of three major synchronised grid systems – the Eastern Interconnection, the Western Interconnection and Texas. They function largely independently, with limited power exchange between them. The Eastern Interconnection comprises the area from the Great Plains states (excluding most of Texas) eastward to the Atlantic coast. The Western Interconnection covers the area west of the Rocky Mountains and the Great Plains to the Pacific coast. The transmission operations of most of Texas are covered by the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT).
It is a fragmented business, with grid operations being carried out by over 1,700 utilities. Some of the system operators stand out for the scale of their operations in the respective grid systems. The California Independent System Operator (CAISO), for instance, controls the largest share of the Western Interconnection. The PJM Independent System Operator is the largest in the Eastern Interconnection. Many utilities holding the transmission networks often operate across the states, thus governed by multiple states’ rules.
Over 60% of the total line length is concentrated at 150-390kV voltage levels, while the higher ratings constitute a residual share. It reflects an inadequate capacity added at higher voltage levels typically utilised in long-distance evacuation projects or interregional transmission corridors. There has been a marked slowdown in capacity addition over the years. Between 2010-2014, the network had an additional high- voltage line length averaging 1,700 miles. From 2015 to 2019, the average addition reached 925 miles. The decline from 2020 to 2023 resulted in an average of 350 miles (Clean Energy Grid, 2024).
In the last couple of years, there have been some concerted efforts to fast-track the transmission projects, which can help revive the momentum. The present challenges for grid utilities are, however, severe as they must plan for and manage inadequacy and ageing. The latter is a critical issue – about 70% of the transmission grid assets are 30 years or older (NCSL, 2023) and new transmission lines often have a lead time of 6-10 years or more.
Source: BNEF
Drivers in Energy Transition
The federal government targets achieving net zero emissions by 2050. This long-term goal involves several interim milestones for decarbonising specific sectors and economic activities. For power sector, the target is to use 100% emission- and pollution-free electricity by 2035 (US Govt, 2024). Some of the major government schemes, such as the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), are instrumental in such ambitious goals.
The capacity requirements are huge. To achieve the 2035 target, the US power sector would require about 2,000GW of new clean-energy generation and storage capacity (IEA, 2024). Renewable power plays a key role in this equation. IEA’s projections for the period 2023-2028 point to 340GW of new renewable power capacity by 2028 – almost equivalent to the total installed renewable capacity as of end- 2023 based on estimates of the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA, 2024). The capacity addition momentum so far (averaging at 31GW during 2021-2023), while already significant, needs a push forward.
Source: Energy Institute
The signs of grid stress from a transitioning energy mix are all too clear. However, it is striking that this is taking place at a stage when the aggregate renewable energy share is not significant, at least relative to some of the major European countries. Further progress in the energy transition, thus, may need to be balanced against practical considerations. The treatment of conventional energy resources such as coal and gas illustrates this. Coal-based power plants are due for retirement, in line with emission norms and decarbonisation goals. The trend shows a decline in coal, but the rate has slowed down. By 2024, only about 3GW would have been retired. About 14GW is aimed for phase out by 2025 – less than the 16.6GW planned initially (S&P Global, 2024). Policy provisions allowing coal and gas co-firing may enable extensions for a few other coal-based generation capacities in the grid supply. Many generators have also sought to switch from coal to gas, taking advantage of the competitive fuel prices.
Defying expectations in a decarbonising framework, the share of gas-based power in grid supply has risen from 35% in 2018 to 43% in 2023. Utilities’ plans indicate capacity expansion in gas-based power. As of May 2024, about 133 new plants were in the planning stages. Some of them are marked as hydrogen-capable plants, making them presentable for regulatory approval in the existing plans (S&P Global, 2024). The shutdown of coal-fired plants in many regions has, in fact, promoted gas-based generation as a reliable alternative (Reuters, 2024).
Conventional power generation, as in coal and gas, finds support from the demand outlook in the US power system. Many utilities are operationalising coal and gas-based power plants to help bridge the possible demand gap. Data centres are the prime movers of the emerging power demand. There is a 15% rise in power demand likely from data centres planned or under development, requiring about 47GW of incremental capacity through 2030 (Goldman Sachs, 2024). In terms of network planning, such a demand outlook marks a sharp reversal from the past trend of flat demand.
Policy Regulation
The regulatory oversight takes place at the federal and regional levels. The Federal Electricity Regulatory Commission (FERC) regulates all activities related to interstate electricity transmission (besides gas transmission and hydropower licences). FERC sets the transmission rates and the vital market rules for the overall transmission business and delegates many of the granular aspects of the business, such as local planning and development, to the regional authorities. The Regional Transmission Organisations and Independent System Operators oversee the regional power system through activities such as open access, regional planning, mapping generation interconnections and retirements, and administering competitive energy markets (modernizethegrid, 2024). State-level authorities such as the public service and public utility commissions are often responsible for the specific transmission routes through a state- level siting and permitting process.
The public funding boost will help catalyse transmission grid investments. Schemes like IRA made over $30 billion worth of financing available for grid investments through loans, grants, and other support mechanisms. The TFP scheme’s $2.5 billion allocation enables financing large transmission projects through capacity contracts, loans, and public-private partnerships. The capacity contracts, wherein the DoE commits to buying up to half of the project’s transmission capacity over up to 40 years, help strengthen investor certainty.
Specific policy and regulatory measures are being directed at the planning and permitting process. This includes FERC’s order in May 2024 to reform the planning practices and DoE’s schemes of the Transmission Facilitation Program (TFP) and the National Interest Electric Transmission Corridors (NIETC). FERC’s order requires each transmission system operator to participate in a regional transmission planning process to identify long-term transmission needs. Both TFP and NIETC were borne out of the US flagship policies of the Infrastructure, Investment and Jobs Act ((IJA) and the IRA. TFP is meant to help finance high-voltage transmission lines, for which IIJA allocated $2.5 billion. Under NIETC, DoE earmarked 10 potential transmission corridors amounting to over 3,500 miles of lines that carried federal backing in their permitting procedures (Clean Energy Grid, 2024). This will likely help rationalise the time taken to secure the procedural approvals.
Transmission planning and its resulting cost allocation have been a longstanding area of contention, on which the regulator had already notified guidance. A couple of recent regulatory developments reinforced its importance. In one such instance, the regulator approved certain incentives for a New Jersey-based transmission project by allocating the cost solely to New Jersey customers. In the other one, a group of cities in Colorado filed a complaint against Xcel Energy’s subsidiary company over the utility’s plan to allocate the cost of the $2 billion transmission project to the cities (S&P Global, 2024).
o add to the list of vital issues being reviewed, the regulator recently notified a revised methodology for calculating transmission owners’ Return on Equity (RoE). Only two financial models, namely the Discounted Cash Flow and Capital Asset Pricing Model, would be used to determine RoE. The immediate impact of FERC’s order was the reduction in MISO-based transmission owners’ base RoE from 10.02% to 9.98% (Baker Botts, 2024). Other transmission owners will accordingly reassess their financials for the possible ramifications.
Market Opportunity
Total grid investment in the US (i.e., transmission and distribution) grew at a compound annual growth rate of 0.5% during 2020-23, reaching $85.2 billion in 2023. Almost two-thirds of this was in the sub-transmission or distribution segments (BNEF, 2024). The estimated investment for 2024 is also likely to be a modest rise over 2023. However, the outlook for the period until 2026, as per BNEF estimates, points to a 4% growth in investment commitments. A few major power markets, such as California and Texas, stand out for their higher investment growth, projected at a CAGR of 7.5%. Notably both these markets had negligible growth in spending during 2020-2023.
The public funding boost will help catalyse transmission grid investments. Schemes like IRA made over $30 billion worth of financing available for grid investments through loans, grants, and other support mechanisms. The TFP scheme’s $2.5 billion allocation enables financing large transmission projects through capacity contracts, loans, and public-private partnerships. The capacity contracts, wherein the DoE commits to buying up to half of the project’s transmission capacity over up to 40 years, help strengthen investor certainty.
In October 2023, DoE announced that it was entering into capacity contract negotiations with three transmission projects aggregating to 3.5GW in grid capacity. By October 2024, four transmission projects were selected for DoE’s capacity contract award, amounting to $1.5 billion in commitment. The selected projects involve 1,000 miles of new lines and 7,100MW of capacity through the US states of Louisiana, Maine, Mississippi, New Mexico, Oklahoma and Texas (DoE, 2024). The projects must commence construction by December 2029, based on the terms of the capacity contract.
The transmission project pipeline received a further boost from the DoE’s NIETC scheme, which marks the high-priority transmission corridors of potential national interest. In May 2024, the list of such projects was circulated. Together, they cover over 3,500 miles across the targeted regions, including the Northwest, Mid- Atlantic, New York and New England, Southwest and Northern Plains. These are in areas where a lack of transmission capacity could potentially raise the cost for end users, or extreme weather could disrupt the grid. The eligible projects of NIETC could avail of direct loans under the Transmission Financing Program expected to start in 2025 (Utility Dive, 2024). The projects would have the regulatory backing in permits, even if they have not received the local or state- level approvals. Importantly, the latest NIETC list overlaps the country’s wind energy resource belt.
Note: (1) Data includes transmission and distribution network (2) Data for Texas and California are based on a review of grid plans. Data on the Rest of the US refer to estimates.
Source: BNEF
Outlook
A study by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), mapping the scenarios of achieving the targeted 100% clean energy supply by 2035, projected a requirement of over 10,000 miles of new high-capacity lines per year (assuming the construction starts in 2026) (NREL, 2022). The same study estimated the additional cost of decarbonising the power system by 2035 to be between $330 billion and $740 billion. The projections indicate the scale of the challenge facing policymakers, regulators, investors, and other stakeholders.
As the project pipeline expands, interregional transmission could be among the most vital to focus on. These projects continue to face hurdles in gaining approvals from multiple state authorities and have also been stuck for the determination of cost allocation among beneficiaries (WRI, 2024). The launch of designated transmission corridors under NIETC is one major step in this direction. There is, however, a significant scope for expanding the investment flow in this segment.
The demand pressure adds to the grid operator’s and utilities’ concerns. For most of them, the power system needs to be prepared for the rather unanticipated high-demand outlook. The emerging data centre hub in the US and its resulting power requirement are forcing an urgency in grid reinforcement and replacement, as much as feasible. Projections point to at least 2%-3% annual growth in demand through 2030 – a massive departure from the last two decades of near-flat demand growth trend. Besides network infrastructure, the US power demand outlook may also impact the decarbonisation goals. Utilities have already taken to delayed coal retirements and new gas capacities to keep their service reliability levels intact (Wood Mackenzie, 2024).
The outlook of the US power system is, therefore, one of significant flux with several moving parts. Yet, the requirements for the power transmission infrastructure are clear and necessitate progress on a war footing. Some of the recent policy and regulatory measures have been encouraging for their fundamental impact on investments. It remains to be seen how far the bottleneck could be avoided in the ongoing progress for Net Zero.